
A prime minister and his chancellor of the Exchequer are at odds. Sound familiar? I’ll come back to that.
Tony Blair’s ten years in office were marked by a running feud with Gordon Brown. Never calm, their relationship was described as everything from a bad marriage to a blood feud. It was such a never-ending soap opera that it became known by an acronym: the TBGB’s. One question in particular poisoned their relationship: when would Blair make good on his promise to turn power over to Brown, as Brown had given way for Blair when the party leadership opened up in 1994? Never was the feud hotter than in 2006, when Brown let run a rift in the Labour party that eventually forced Blair to announce that he would leave office the following year. At the time the left-wing Labour M.P John McDonnell said, “Most of us have looked on aghast. It’s almost been like an episode of ‘The Sopranos’.”
In recent weeks, there’s been a growing buzz in
Finally today an apology of sorts by Brown appears in the Guardian: “I take full responsibility for all my actions, but I think we’re dealing with a bigger problem that is global in nature, as well as national. Perhaps 10 years ago after the Asian crisis when other countries thought these problems would go away, we should have been tougher . . . keeping and forcing these issues on to the agenda like we did on debt relief and other issues of international policy.”
Feud over? Not yet. Now Brown and Darling are said to be at odds over the size of the second stage of
No comments:
Post a Comment