Friday, 25 September 2009

Kaddafi, Blair and the Imported Camels

Muammar Kaddafi is one of those people you can never read too much about. Witness his failure to find lodgings in New York this past week, his call for Barack Obama, "son of Africa," to rule "forever," and so forth. Anyway, here's a great story told to me by John Burton, who was Tony Blair's constituency agent in the north of England for many years:

"[T]here’s a lovely tale Tony told me about [Muammar] Kaddafi of Libya. Tony’s going to meet him in a tented caravan—oasis, palm trees, sand, camels. So Tony said, “I go out and he greets me in English and he does the interview in Arabic for the local television.” And half way through, Kaddafi stops, puts his hand on Tony’s knee and says “Tony, why did you want camels?” And Tony said “Pardon? Camels? I don’t know anything about camels.” And Kaddafi says, “From Downing Street. They said you wanted camels.” And Tony says, “Oh. They’ll just be … it’ll be for a picture.” And Kaddafi says, “Well, it’s just it was a bit of a problem because we don’t have any camels here. So we’ve had to import them.” [Burton laughs] They’d had to import them from another part of Libya! That was wonderful!"

Monday, 7 September 2009

School Daze

American Conservatives have been up in arms since the White House announced last month that Obama would give a back-to-school speech tomorrow when many students have their first day of classes of the new academic year. America being America, there are diametrically opposed views on the speech. Education Secretary Arne Duncan says Obama simply wants to encourage the country's youth to do their best: "The president's whole message is about personal responsibility and challenging students to take their education very, very seriously." Wait a minute, says Florida Republican party chairman Jim Greer, who is "absolutely appalled that taxpayer dollars are being used to spread President Obama's socialist ideology." Have a look at this discussion.

Footnote: A change of heart from Jim Greer in Florida. "My kids watched it,," he said, "and I thought it was appropriate." His rationale: "The White House responded to the concerns of parents and educators across this country." Or Greer was wrong in the first place.

Wednesday, 2 September 2009

Of Fires and Angels

My father-in-law called last night to say the skies over Boulder, Colorado, were dusky with smoke and ash from the forest fires raging north of Los Angeles - a distance of about 1,000 miles. I was reminded of a piece I did for Newsweek in 1993, when we lived in L.A. and monster fires were burning not too far north of us, in the Santa Monica Mountains and along the coast. This is what I saw as I was driving north to south along the Pacific Coast Highway:

From the coast, at midnight last Tuesday, the Thousand Oaks wildfire appeared as a pair of sunspots along the Santa Monica Mountains ridgeline. The two pulsated and flared in the Santa Ana winds that must be something like the hot tramontana land wind of Spain that Gabriel Garcia Marquez says "carries with it the seeds of madness." The fire had been started on a faraway golf course the previous afternoon. Soon Santa Anas would send it over the ridge, down to the Pacific. Then shifting winds suddenly off the water would push the fire back up the hillsides, roughly along its earlier path, back toward the once golden grasses off the 16th green at Los Robles, where it had all begun.

By then a dozen other fires had also broken out - a string of firecrackers exploding in the dry chaparral and sage of the Los Angeles Basin. The symbolism of fires encircling Los Angeles seemed all too appropriate. Eighteen months ago flames spread across the center of Los Angeles as arsonists torched more than 1,000 buildings in the riots. This was at the heart of the megalopolis, a down-at-the-heels, mostly black and brown part of town. In wealthier, whiter places, like Brentwood and Beverly Hills, residents worried (with little cause) that those fires would come their way. Last week's fires were mostly the result of arson, too, not acts of God. But this time all but one of them - the Chatsworth fire, in distant northwest L.A. - burned outside the city limits and struck at the middle and upper classes.

The wildfires appear, at first glance, to be an economic leveler in a place where social disparities resemble those of the Third World. L.A.'s brush fires, like the mudslides that slurp Malibu mansions into canyons and ravines during the rainy season, have almost always hit the wealthy who can afford to five on hills and oceanfront lots with magnificent views and cleaner air. But many of the shop-owners in South-Central have little hope of rebuilding out of the ashes in still-empty lots, whereas the prosperous residents who were burned out in Altadena (northeast of downtown) or Laguna Beach (on the California Riviera) have generous homeowners' insurance and are already talking about starting again - many taking the opportunity to remodel kitchens and enlarge decks. Those who escaped relatively unscathed can thank their rooftop sprinklers and their pool-fed firefighting pumps. The chlorine may kill the bushes, but it can save the house.

Local papers duly reported the names of celebrities whose ranches and homes the fires had narrowly missed: Richard Widmark, Tom Selleck, Dick Clark. In the Eaton Canyon area, a still-smoking Jaguar sedan sat in the remains of a garage; the car was charred, its tires melted right down to the hubs. Backyard pools were coated with ash. By one, a collection of metal lawn furniture stood arranged as if the residents were expecting guests. Down the hill the Gerrish Swim and Tennis Club offered lessons, but the sign is all that is left of the club. Of course, the fires' victims were not uniformly well-to-do. In Orange County, at El Morro trailer park, the fires left nothing of one row of mobile homes but a satellite dish, and, on the concrete pads, traces of white, the ashen residue of what had been.

The riot fires of the inner city and the wildfires of the hillsides and oceanfronts are only the most visible symbol of the fragile state of California. Not many years ago the place seemed uniquely blessed. But Prop 13 and the tax revolt chewed holes in bare public parks and the superb state-university system. Aerospace crashed. Real estate plunged. Bases closed. The state that, perhaps more than any other, immigration built, turned on its newest immigrants. The California Dream, once so well worn that it became a cliche, has become an oxymoron - mocked by the record-setting exodus from the state and vilified by those who feel trapped and left behind.

Los Angeles is particularly vulnerable. A true sense of community has never thrived here. Even in the halcyon days of the '80s, Los Angeles did not really cohere, as do other cities like San Antonio or Denver or Seattle. And now the city's underlying social fissures are crystallized for most of America in the gruesome beating videos of Rodney King and Reginald Denny. Los Angeles has come to see itself in those screen images as well: a place so divided by race and class that people have trouble distinguishing victim from aggressor. These days, to outsiders and insiders alike, the City of Angels looks increasingly like a devilish place to live.

Dispatches from the Newspaper Wars

For a terrific tour d'horizon of the newspaper business's "blackened landscape," as Michael Massing calls it, have a look at his piece in The New York Review of Books. It contains a number of (pleasant) surprises about the industry in the United States. Among them:

* "The MTV generation, known for its indifference to news, has given way to the Obama generation, which craves it."

* "According to one study, of all the time readers spend with a newspaper, 96 percent of it is spent on print editions and barely more than 3 percent on the Web."

* "Similarly, of the $38.5 billion spent on newspaper ads in 2008, just $3 billion was spent on the Web." (Of course, advertising overall has been in decline, but that's another part of the story.)

* Content-charging is working for many papers and gathering steam.

* He found "all kinds of excited activity" in the growing area of nonprofit funding of newspapers. Much of it was apparently incited by this Op-Ed piece in the New York Times earlier this year.

Have a look at Massing's article. Better yet go out and buy the September 24 issue of The New York Review of Books at the newsstand. How radical is that?